FDA shutters its alternative device report database, disclosing 20 years of safety data

The posted archive includes more than 6 million alternative summary reports from 1999 to April 2019. (Andrew Harnik, Associated Press)

The FDA has followed through with plans to formally end its Alternative Summary Reporting program, making 20 years’ worth of medical device safety data publicly available.

The once-obscure program had granted device manufacturers exemptions to the standard reporting rules related to disclosing harms—for “certain well-known events associated with specific devices” often described in product labeling, the agency’s device center director, Jeffrey Shuren, said in a statement.

This included 108 exemptions given to individual device makers since the program’s launch in 1997, which allowed them to instead submit summaries of adverse event reports on a quarterly basis.

Submissions Open

Fierce Innovation Awards: Life Sciences Edition 2020

Submit your entry to demonstrate innovative technologies and services that have the potential to make the greatest impact for biotech and pharma companies.

But now the FDA has revoked the last remaining allowances granted to the program’s final 13 manufacturers, covering three categories of devices: dental implants, implantable cardiac defibrillators and pacemaker electrodes.

RELATED: FDA chief calls for release of all data tracking problems with medical devices

An investigation earlier this year by Kaiser Health News detailed the vast and growing scope of the program over the years, which had collected 1.1 million reports of harm and device malfunctions since 2016 alone—including more than half of safety reports related to surgical staplers.

Over 56,000 stapler malfunctions were reported to the agency from 2011 through 2018. Earlier this year, the FDA proposed to reclassify the devices as higher-risk, Class II products, following an agency review that found more than 32,000 malfunctions, over 9,000 serious injuries and 366 related deaths. Those reports included misfirings, malformed staples or reopenings in the wound—as well as user errors, such as selecting the wrong cartridge size during a procedure.

RELATED: FDA to reclassify surgical staplers as Class II devices requiring premarket review

Going forward, the archive of more than 6 million alternative summary reports from 1999 to April 2019 will be hosted separately from the FDA’s main public device safety database, known as MAUDE, which is designed for mandatory reporters such as manufacturers, as well as voluntary reporters, including healthcare professionals and patients.

In addition, the FDA said it plans to make MAUDE more user-friendly and accessible over the next few years, as the agency and its device center modernize their IT systems.

Suggested Articles

A delay to Moderna's phase 3 COVID-19 study is part of a trend of tensions in the biotech’s relationship with the U.S. government, Reuters reported.

Novartis has teamed up with smart inhaler developer Propeller Health to co-package and ship its digital medication-tracking platform.

GlaxoSmithKline is continuing its strategy of giving out access to its vaccine platform as it adds Medicago to its growing partners list.