Study: Some DVT patients do better with combo intervention/drug treatment

While most patients with deep vein thrombosis should be treated with blood thinners alone, an NIH-backed study found that patients with the largest blood clots are most likely to benefit from a combo approach of anticoagulants and interventional treatment.

Update: This story was updated to include additional comments from principal investigator Suresh Vedantham.

An NIH-funded trial found that most patients suffering from deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should still be treated with the standard-of-care clot-busting drugs. But some patients, who are more likely to develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), would benefit from interventional treatment in addition to blood thinners, the study found.

DVT refers to a clot forming in one of the body’s deep veins, usually in the legs. It may cause pain and swelling in the leg, but there is also a risk the clot will break off, travel to the lungs and block blood flow, according to the NIH. DVT patients are usually treated with anticoagulant drugs and compression stockings.


Like this story? Subscribe to FierceBiotech!

Biopharma is a fast-growing world where big ideas come along every day. Our subscribers rely on FierceBiotech as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data in the world of biotech and pharma R&D. Sign up today to get biotech news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

The ATTRACT study involved 692 patients with acute DVT in their femoral, common femoral and/or iliac veins, according to a Society of Interventional Radiology statement. The study was presented on Monday at the SIR’s annual meeting and was funded primarily by the NIH, with support from SIR and Boston Scientific, BSN Medical, Medtronic and Genentech.

The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups. The first received blood thinners alongside interventional treatment, known as pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT), while the control group was treated with anticoagulants alone.

Patients who received both treatments were 25% less likely to develop moderate to severe PTS than were patients in the control group, the study found. PTS symptoms range from chronic leg pain and swelling to skin ulcers and disability. While both groups had roughly the same rate of PTS, patients with the largest blood clots, known as iliofemoral DVT, have the highest risk of developing PTS and so are most likely to benefit from the combination treatment.

“These findings allow healthcare professionals to make better decisions as to who may benefit from PCDT, ensuring that patient care teams deliver the best care, while reducing harm from unnecessary treatments,” said principal investigator Suresh Vedantham, M.D., a professor of radiology and surgery at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at the Washington University School of Medicine, in the statement.

This study provides the first "solid" information that can guide DVT treatment, Vedantham said. In the past, doctors' decisions on treating DVT were based and opinion and consensus. Now, there is data that quantifies the benefits and risks of using an invasive procedure to break up the clot, he said.

Suggested Articles

What the NASH field needs, says Genfit CEO Pascal Prigent, is something like the Hb1Ac test for diabetes.

Dubbed “Project Nightingale,” the efforts were announced amid concerns and federal inquiries into the data’s safekeeping and patient consent for use.

Exact Sciences received an FDA breakthrough designation for its liver cancer blood test as it finalized its $2.8 billion merger with Genomic Health.