Developers: Politics behind slow approval process

Woodcock's defense, though, may seem particularly hard to accept at a slate of big pharma companies which have been able to win European approvals only to run straight into a roadblock at the U.S. agency. Galvus, Acomplia and Cervarix have all been OK'd by the European Medicines Agency, but are still languishing at the FDA. And Novartis says it may simply skip the U.S. market for Galvus if the feds raise the bar too high for the diabetes drug. The Wall Street Journal notes that a number of analysts believe the FDA faces a higher degree of public and political pressure during the approval process--precisely the kind of influences that Woodcock rejects as a significant factor.

"The scientists and physicians who are reviewing the products are looking over their shoulder at Capitol Hill," says James Shannon, Novartis' departing head of drug development. "I think it results in them taking decisions which are conservative."

- read the story in the Wall Street Journal

Related Articles:
FDA getting tougher with refuse-to-file letters. Report
The FDA: Caught between a rock and a hard place. Report
FDA quick to reject drugs as it gets more cautious. Report
Dry spell or parched desert for NME approvals? Report
Blogster sees lessons in FDA approvable letters. report

Suggested Articles

Novartis unveiled more data showing how its asthma combo QMF149 fared against the standard of care: a combination of the same types of drugs.

Johns Hopkins researchers developed a biodegradable polymer to transport large therapies into cells—including genes and even CRISPR.

UCB’s bispecific antibody recently beat Johnson & Johnson’s Stelara at clearing psoriasis symptoms, and now it has bested AbbVie’s Humira, too.