10 reforms for drug advertising

At BrandweekRx, Jim Edwards outlines 10 direct-to-consumer advertising reforms he says are urgently needed to protect consumers from unscrupulous drug advertising. Edwards' recommendations include banning product-placement ads and forcing drug companies to disclose to the SEC how much money they're spending on advertising (companies don't have to say how much is spent promoting a drug, but it's about double the cost of R&D). He also recommends an FDA requirement for head-to-head studies between competing drugs so that doctors can make educated decisions when prescribing medications. Finally, Edwards argues in favor of total transparency of the amount and usage of drug company dollars spent on Continuing Medical Education, along with full disclosure of payments and gifts to doctors.

- read this blog entry to see all 10 recommendations

Related Articles:
Does the FDA do enough to regulate drug ads? Report
PhRMA ad guidelines quickly draw fire as weak, meaningless. Report
Drug industry proposes limits on advertising. Report
AMA to study the impact of drug advertising. Report

Suggested Articles

Galecto picked up $64 million to push its lead lung disease treatment toward an approval in Europe and fund midstage studies for its other programs.

The financing, which attracted support from Roche Venture Fund, sets Palladio up to test its vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist in a kidney disease.

A new atlas of 500,000 cardiac cells could help researchers better understand how a healthy heart operates—and what goes wrong in heart disease.