FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare
About | Sample | Privacy

PBMs making big bucks off specialty drugs

Drugmakers aren't the only ones making money off the specialty drug trend. Specialty drugs, many of which are biologics, are used to treat a range of rare or difficult diseases, including various cancers, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, anemia and hepatitis. And pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), which distribute these drugs to patients, are realizing a growing profit from high-priced products.

Take the case of Questcor's H.P. Athcar Gel. Last year patients and payors were shocked when the price of Questocor's epilepsy treatment increased from $1,600 a vial to $23,000. The decision was made after Questcor did market research and determined that its drug would sell at the higher price (incidentally, Questcor landed in the number one spot of FiercePharma's best stocks of 2007 list). To curb costs, pharmacy benefits managers are designed to enforce rules on drug selection, usage, and dosage. But as the New York Times observes, this specialty drug trend is "seemingly at odds with that best-price mission." The paper notes paper that Express Scripts, CVS Caremark and Medco Health Solutions have been making increasingly large profits off the specialty drugs they sell, particularly when they sign contract to be exclusive or semi-exclusive distributors of rare drugs.

"We are headed right down into conflict alley with these exclusive arrangements," Gerry Purcell, an Atlanta-based health benefits consultant, told the Times. The exclusive licensing agreements between drugmakers and distributors mean PBMs "can raise the prices at will, and the employer will have little chance but to pay the bill."

- read the story in the New York Times

Related Articles:
Specialty-drug spending spawns protest
Can specialty drugs turn pharma tide?
Specialty drugs emerge as key price driver

More stories about drug prices   PBMs   Questcor   Rheumatoid Arthritis   Anemia drugs   specialty drugs  

Comments

If you are going to regurgitate someone else's article, at least put forth some sentiment of journalistic effort in validating what you're talking about. These companies distribute drugs for manufacturers that dont want to take on the logistic and financial risk associated with doing so. When massive price increases take place, its the manufacturer that decides on and ultimately benefits from such moves. You would be better off simply linking to the already misleading NYT article and leave it at taht.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 52 + 26?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.