FierceBiotechFierceBiotechResearchFierceBiotechITFierceVaccinesFiercePharmaFiercePharmaManufacturing   FierceHealthcare

Dr. Reddy's make risky biogenerics move

At the Motley Fool, Brian Orelli analyzes a recent decision by India-based generic drug developer Dr. Reddy's Laboratories to spend $20 million to produce eight new generic versions of biologics over the next eight years and double its biogeneric operation to 340 people in the next two years. The drugmaker hasn't specified which drugs it plans to copy.

The biotech industry has long held that while it's not opposed to generic competition, manufacturing generic biologics is extremely complex process, and that generic drugmakers should be required to conduct clinical trials to prove the bioequivalencey of their drugs.

Dr. Reddy's move is risky, considering the FDA has yet to roll out a faster, less expensive route to generic approval. But given the sometimes astronomical costs of biotech drugs, and the fact that a number of biologics will be coming off patent in the next few years, the FDA has been fielding increasing demands for a faster biologic approval process. There is no such process yet, but it certainly seems that in the near future, the FDA will put in place a system by which generic biologics can prove their equavelancy to branded drugs without having to conduct costly clinical trials.

The manufacturing facilities required to make these drugs take time to build, but by getting a head start now, Dr. Reddy's will be able to beat out other generic developers and hit the ground running if and when the FDA green-lights a faster approval process. As Orelli observes, "The company is taking a huge risk to get ahead of the pack, but I think it's well worth the rewards of being in front of its competitors."

- see the Motley Fool article for more

Related Articles:
Lawmakers propose pathway for approving biosimilars. Report
Governors petition FDA to allow biosimilars. Report
Legislation could clear way for biosimilars. Report

More stories about patent   Generics   FDA   drug developer   Dr. Reddy's   biotech news   biotech drugs   Biologics  

Comments

Why does everyone think that the current ways of doing things are the only ways? What if Dr. Reddy's has figured out how to do things quickly and better.

Just a curious observation: For Dr. Reddy's to have "20 biosimilars" means some of these must be therapeutic mabs. If Reddy's is indeed including identical sequence biosimilar antibodies in their portfolio of "20 biosimilar" products, then they have seriously miscalculated. Biosimilars with abbreviated clinical development will probably ultimately be acceptable for smaller, more well-characerized proteins like EPO and hGH, but mabs will probably require extensive and protracted clinical evaluation, especially for immunogenicity in chronic indications, resulting in hardly any economic benefits. Bio-similar mabs with identical sequence, if this is Reddy's strategy, is a very bad move.

Sorry, I meant "8 biosimilars" not 20, but even with this number they must have biosimilar mabs in their portfolio (Reditux is an example of their sequence identical anti-CD20 marketed in India, but no way it will get abbreviated approval in US)

I Appreciate your presumption theory ;-) .. Still Reditux is the 1st biosimilar monocloncal antibody in the world, manufactured by Dr. Reddy's - an emerging global pharmaceutical company from India with proven credentials in biologics. This product is right now approved for marketing in India. It is surely economical and has earned the trust of oncologists - both the trial group as well as the clinicians.

Very good article thank you...www.1evdenevenakliyat.info/

Likewise, Emcure Pharma, Pune is making HPV vaccine using the identical sequences of Merck and/or GSK. So, would that be approved the abbreviated way in India?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.